Loading…
Stories
Every piece is written to pass the swap test: swap the party labels, and it should still read as fair.
No statute compels a losing side to concede. What compels it is a chain of choices, made by ordinary people, that has held for more than two centuries.
The Constitution never says a defeated candidate must step aside. The peaceful transfer of power survives because each generation decides to keep it — and the winner's half of the bargain matters as much as the loser's.
Nobody sets the pothole budget in Washington. The votes that shape your actual week are the ones with the lowest turnout.
The office most likely to affect your commute, your water bill, and your child's classroom size is decided in an election most people skip. That mismatch is worth taking seriously.
It is easy to demand honesty from leaders and media. The commitment is harder, and more important, when it turns around and asks something of us.
Five practices for ordinary readers who want to hold themselves to the same standard they hold politicians and the press: notice the feeling, separate the claim from the messenger, disclose uncertainty, correct in public, and ask what would change your mind.
The people who show up to the hearing are not the public. Neither are the people who fund the campaign. Finding the common good means looking for who isn't in the room.
Organized interests are legitimate, and so is expertise. But neither is the same as the common good. This essay offers habits of attention for anyone who sits on a board, in a council, or at a hearing.
Disagreement built the republic. Contempt is what could unbuild it — and it is available in equal measure to every side.
Anger says you are wrong. Contempt says you are beneath argument. This essay traces what contempt does to the machinery of self-government and why the cure is not niceness but arguing hard with people rather than at them.
Admitting you were wrong costs status. It is also one of the few habits that makes democratic argument possible at all.
Changing your mind quietly, in private, costs nothing. Changing it in public, in front of people who remember what you used to say, is a specific and undervalued civic skill.
Losing well is not passivity. It is one of the harder skills self-government asks of its citizens, and it has to be practiced somewhere other than the highest-stakes election of the decade.
A ballot measure fails, a favored candidate loses a primary, a proposal gets voted down at the town meeting. What happens next says more about a citizen's civic character than any vote they ever cast.